I mean there are a lot of malcontents in the social media age, biology notwithstanding

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Maybe I’m just not qualified but I don’t understand the thrust of this piece. The analyses of recent novels seem interesting and illuminating; the desperation to yoke them to particular incarnations of postmodernism is not.

The author seems to have fallen into the classic trap described by William Empson about critical jargon: it makes you feel at home when you are not.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

This is a sloppy sentence that deserves a closer look. The rush to define an ancient rhetorical strat as postmodern is confusing and weird. I’m reminded of the exam notes to what I believe was the 2004 practical criticism exam at the University of Cambridge, where students where given passages from a range of time periods which were palpably aware of their medium, and scrambled to say they all “prefigured Beckett” as if he was the first writer to put pen to paper with an awareness of what he was doing

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.