What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

The news has been filled with hate (often directed at the LGBT+ community), and there hasn’t been enough tangible change.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Wait what? Where did that come from? It was the aim of the Fire Phone, for sure. Needs exegesis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J7NjvueVoc

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

This is kind of a harsh accusation to level at Nintendo, who for a long tie have held off the micropayment model, giving their games a level of completion and meaning most now simply don’t have.

http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/micropayments-mega-angst-and-the-future-of-console-games/

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

I think this needs a lot of work.

Firstly, the thrust of the paragraph is about video / computer games in general, not Pokémon Go, which the editorial is supposed to be about.

Second, I have as many grievances with late capitalism as the next Guardian reader, but I don’t really buy this end of innocence stuff. Video games as in the ones played on a box and not connected to the web are a very different proposition from ones played on a phone connected to the web; in fact you could easily argue the former have more in common with Action Men and Barbies than they do with the latter.

Also, how far back in human history are we being asked to regress to find the acapitalist playtime? When was the first toy made, and when was the first toy traded for something else?

Pic related, a toy from 900BC

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

I was almost convinced then you ended on this “good old days” cliché

J/k I wasn’t convinced

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

I don’t understand—does this refer to the video games of old, which weren’t tainted with micropayments? Or just to the post-micropayment era? Most products are marketed to some extent; you’d have to go pretty far back to find a state of primordial play that did not use something which had somehow been marketed.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Okay so this feels a lot like dumping a big theoretical statement then rushing on to something else in the hope that the reader can’t be bothered to call you out on it. I can be bothered.

Play is usually used by psychologists and their ilk to mean quite basic activities like handling objects, dressing up, even banging things to produce a sound. Pokémon is a game with a clear set of rules and mechanics. If you want to make this point, you need to press on “game” and not play. There are clear rewards to finishing non-micropayment games.

Pic and caption are Wikipedia’s, not mine

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.