With this line, Dickinson begins a curious condensation of major Biblical figures and places, describing most with an epithet of no more than three words until the full stop, after which the speaker dwells on “Sin” for far longer (relatively speaking). By reducing these multi-faceted figures to brief epithets, Dickinson demonstrates the lack of attention to these captivating aspects of the Bible in favor of “Sin” and “Condemn[ation]” that drives the “boys” away.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

These extreme condensations of Biblical tales end with a telling enjambmentSin is the only one of these colossal Biblical subjects that is described with more than three words. These lines are also normative, since “Others must resist” sin, where none of the other descriptions are.
With these devices, the speaker touches on the heart of the issue before she describes it explicitly in the final lines. These lines “condemn.”

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Emily Dickinson sent this poem, often referred to as 1557 (its Fr#) or by its first line, to her nephew Ned “when he was probably ill.” She prefaced it with the note, “‘Sanctuary Privileges’ for Ned, as he is unable to attend” (Phillips 167).

The poem expresses a frustration with the way in which biblical stories were presented to youth—an especially important issue for Amherst residents who were in the midst of moving away from austere Calvinism. As Lundin puts it in Dickinson and the Art of Belief, “Over the course of the first several decades of the nineteenth century, the transformation of the Edwardian legacy continued across new England. Following the lead of Dwight and others, evangelical Christians sought increasingly to link church and society by stressing the moral improvement of the self rather than the inscrutable will and character of God” (12).


Lundin, Roger. Emily Dickinson and the Art of Belief. N.p.: William B. Eerdmans Pub., 2004. Print.

Phillips, Elizabeth. Emily Dickinson: Personae and Performance. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1988. Print.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Gross

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

So much criticism of GoT is based on this weird idea that every single scene has to explicitly move the plot or develop a character in a new way, which is frustrating and kind of sad. I don’t want to watch a show where everything “need[ed]” to happen. Granted, GoT can start to feel a bit like Titus Andronicus when it isn’t careful. This might be one of those cases, but we shouldn’t argue against it just because it wasn’t absolutely necessary.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

That they are (too easy). One of the greatest things I learned this year was the importance of charitable reading. Any asshole can point out where Aristotle went wrong scientifically—but that misses the whole point of reading him.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

See Leibniz’s Monadology—I certainly wouldn’t say it makes him look like an idiot, but in Russell’s words, “the Monadology was a kind of fantastic fairy tale, coherent perhaps, but wholly arbitrary.”

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

This reminds me of a section at the end of Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals:

Now I say every being that cannot act except under the idea of freedom is just for that reason in a practical point of view really free, that is to say, all laws which are inseparably connected with freedom have the same force for him as if his will had been shown to be free in itself by a proof theoretically conclusive. Now I affirm that we must attribute to every rational being which has a will that it has also the idea of freedom and acts entirely under this idea. For in such a being we conceive a reason that is practical, that is, has causality in reference to its objects.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Unreviewed Annotation 1 Contributor ?

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

While Daenerys has a knack for scene-ending lines, she ironically drives homes Tyrion’s concerns with this extremely ambitious (and perhaps naïve) line.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.

Unreviewed Annotation 1 Contributor ?

What is this?

The Genius annotation is the work of the Genius Editorial project. Our editors and contributors collaborate to create the most interesting and informative explanation of any line of text. It’s also a work in progress, so leave a suggestion if this or any annotation is missing something.

To learn more about participating in the Genius Editorial project, check out the contributor guidelines.

Loading...

Peep the line and annotation here:

For more on Led Zeppelin and other bands' uses of Tolkien, check out this Rolling Stone article.

This video is processing – it'll appear automatically when it's done.